HOT TOPICS >> ARRA | Recovery Audit Contractors | Women in Health IT | Collections | Bond Ratings | Charity Care
Are salaried physicians the key to health reform?
Comments
Your attitude is insulting. What works for the Mayo clinic or Cleveland clinic is not necessarily the best model for the rest of the country. One downside of employed physicians is that when you have smaller facilities, controlled by not the sharpest-pencil-in-the-drawer administrators, there is a very real attitude to start holding quality of care hostage. That is, if a hospital screws up, cuts corners, whatever, the hospital signs the check and it happens that the doctor finds out he/she can either shut up or hit the road.
I don't want to be an employed physician, and there are tens, if not hundreds of thousands of us out there who are not. This is probably especially true in the specialty field.
The Mayo Clinic and Cleveland clinic are the aberrrant models, not private practice. Yours is the smarmy attitude that keeps us in private practice.
You'll notice this article talks about the need to empower physicians precisely so that they can avoid this kind of dilemna. When physicians have the chance to have a say in the administration of care within their hospitals, as they do at both Mayo and Cleveland Clinic, the result is a collaborative model which provides better care with less waste. Nothing in the above article is "smarmy" in the least as they clearly reference the need for this kind of joint decision making.
When do we salary attorneys, plumbers, insurance agents and car salesmen? I do not wish to have the worst brain surgeon making the same amount of money than the best, nor do I want them doing my brain surgery.
Of course who decides how much each specialty makes? That should be fun...
In the same vein, then all offices will become government salaried positions? File clerks, aides and nursing will be rolled over to the government employ? Who is paying the rent and electricity?
Control of liability is always left out of this discussion also. Tort reform must be at the forefront of this discussion. Also the general public needs to understand that if things don't go your way, you can't sue everyone for your misfortune.
John Kerry was harping on the reduction of "administrative costs" to reduce the cost of health care, which of course it would. When have we seen government mandates reduce the administrative costs.

