FierceHealthcare FierceHealthIT FierceMobileHealthcare FierceHealthPayer
FierceHealthFinance FierceEMR FiercePracticeManagemtn Hospital Impact

Bad credit news for non-profit hospitals continues

It seems like not-for-profit hospitals just can't catch a break when it comes to bond issues. The latest pain to afflict such bond holders comes from the squeeze placed on them by changes in the "swaps" method of managing the overall interest costs on their variable-rate bonds.

Under this system, hospitals typically pay a fixed rate to a counterparty and get a floating rate in return, experts say. In theory, for complex reasons, the floating rate they get cancels out the floating rate they pay, which should leave them with a lower fixed rate. 

The bottom line on all of this is that, as with auction rate bond issues, the usual dodge just isn't working any more. With swap rates falling from the level at which non-profit hospitals wrote their deals, they now have to put up a huge chunk of cash just to keep the deal afloat. Sometimes, the cash can be as much as 10 percent of the swap, or, say, $10 million on $100 million, notes one industry analyst.

The net result of all of this isn't just hospital CFOs with migraines, it's also falling ratings on hospital debt. For example, West Penn Allegheny Health Care System has now found that its Moody's Ba3-rated junk bond debt trading at a ghastly 48 cents on the dollar. As ratings agencies like Moody's and Standard & Poor's continue to lower ratings on hospital debt, there's could very well be a cascade of hospitals defaulting in the first or second quarter of next year, some observers predict.

To learn more about the non-profit hospital debt conundrum:
- read this Wall Street Journal piece (sub. req.)

Related Articles:
Moody's downgrades 18 hospital bond ratings in two months
Obama healthcare plan a plus for hospitals, Moody's says
Moody's ratings changes could raise healthcare credit ratings
Bond buy-backs could stress hospitals' liquidity, Moody's says

SHARE WITH:
Email Twitter Facebook LinkedIn StumbleUpon
Get Your FREE FierceHealthFinance Email Newsletter:
Comments (1) | Post a comment

Comments

Do we need to reduce/remove much of the [institutional] debt service from health care, and place a moratorium on debt financings pertaining to expanding health care capacity? If we limit the private profit from the issuance of public debt, will we be taking a step to slow corporate welfare for institutions (and the folks that run them)? The answer is unclear. Yet considering the serious impact of debt default by large institutions it's time for society [and heretofore sleepy regulators] to take an interest in these private business behaviors. The Corker proposal for the automakers may turn out to have broader applications in the future. We'll see.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.