FierceHealthcare FierceHealthIT FierceMobileHealthcare FierceHealthPayer
FierceHealthFinance FierceEMR FiercePracticeManagemtn Hospital Impact

Could capitation be the hot new payment trend?

While capitation never disappeared, its heyday ended more than a decade ago--or so most hospitals thought. Pennsylvania's largest health insurer, Pittsburgh-based Highmark Inc., could be in the initial stages of negotiating "global" capitated payments with some of the state's rural health systems, says the American Medical News.

Neither Highmark nor Meadville Medical Center or Heritage Valley Health System (the two systems that local media have identified as potential partners) will comment on any negotiations. However, Highmark is "in the most preliminary stages of discussion" to determine whether providers are willing to consider "alternative reimbursement approaches, consistent with some of the approaches being discussed during the healthcare reform debate," says Highmark spokesman Michael Weinstein.

Highmark hasn't had any capitated contracts with healthcare providers since 2006. However, a kinder, gentler capitation that involves more than denying care to control costs is now an option. Highmark has been "an avid watcher" of the Pittsburgh Regional Health Initiative's (PRHI) work to develop a type of global payment/integrated care model called an accountable care organization for rural hospitals and physicians that aren't formally integrated, says PRHI spokesman Cliff Shannon. To date, the PRHI's pilot projects haven't changed payment structures, but such changes are likely in the future, he says.

If Highmark does pursue global payments to hospitals, the change shouldn't be a total shock. As of July 2009, HMOs had 3.5 million enrollees in Pennsylvania (a 28 percent penetration rate), according to statistics from the Kaiser Family Foundation. 

To learn more about Highmark's plans:
- read the American Medical News article

Related Articles:
Capitation creeping into contracts
Mass. moving ahead with bundled payment model

SHARE WITH:
Email Twitter Facebook LinkedIn StumbleUpon
Get Your FREE FierceHealthFinance Email Newsletter:
Comments (1) | Post a comment

Comments

In an environment where high deductible health plans with savings options (HDHP/SO) make up only about 5% of policies in the Northeast U.S. (from KFF.org), many enrollees are members of PPOs and fewer in HMOs. This could be a real problem if the enrollment levels are not high in the HMO plans because provider success in capitation relies upon having enough critical mass to sustain and spread the risk of higher utilizers.

The reason I bring up the HDHP/SO statistic is because if the healthiest members (even if only 5%) are siphoned off of the HMO product, the smaller number of HMO enrollees is further impacted because that population may contain more adversely selected members who are sicker, older, poorer, etc.

Providers will also need to remain compliant with the 1997 Physician Incentive Plan rules that require providers to purchase excess loss insurance (reinsurance) if the physician's income is placed at more than 25% risk, and is scheduled in certain amounts based on population size, (which was calculated absent the HDHP/SO siphon back in 1995-1996). One new problem we didn't have in 1997 is that there are few reinsurers willing to underwrite capitated providers.

Finally, those who went through "Hard Knocks University" and graduated who know how to negotiate and manage capitated risk have since retired and are now greeters at the hospital.

The new crop of managed care analysts and negotiators as well as a new crop of opportunistic consultants with their one-size fits all solutions and an experience of n=0 will be available to "guide" providers who accept the global cap to new heights of bankruptcy. We should not expect any different, that is exactly what happened last time for many.

Global capitation structured properly with the right care at the right level by the right physician group, the right evidence based medicine, the right actuarial data, and adequate reinsurance and an unambiguous contract can work.
Unfortunately I haven't seen these Utopian contracts offered, and I don't think the training has been done recently enough to prepare the providers for this.

Lucky for the payers, if they succeed in getting these contracts signed, their inefficiencies remain unchecked, the bonuses are predictable, and their claims costs become predictable and fixed. With the doctors and hospitals accepting the risk of insurance and the clinical risk, we won't need insurance reform- just a new edition of FierceHealth called FierceCapitation!

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.