HOT TOPICS >> ARRA | Recovery Audit Contractors | Women in Health IT | Collections | Bond Ratings | Charity Care
HFMA ANI 2009: News and advice from the RAC front
Comments
The RAC has gone a long ways towards keeping Medicare fraud more under control than it ever has been. Check the percentages - upon review, a lot of claims are billed in error, or upcoded, or simply do not have the documentation to support doing the service in the first place. Is the RAC 100% foolproof and the best thing in the world? Of course not - but it does a lot towards making providers and billing centers more cautious - and accountable - in regards to correct billing
Please dont make it sound like like RAC is Don Quixote in disguise, cleaning up the fraud in the Mrdicare system. It will never have the respect of providers because in the RAC contractors frequently are arbitrarily applying criteria and denying many bona fide acute hospitalizations. The approach has been to hit them hard and deny many claims in the knowledge that many hospitals dont have the staff to appeal through the various levels. Then they can tout the lack of reversals as testimony to their "appropriate denials". Hospitals need to either appeal or find denial management firms that can help sort through the bonafide denials and those that are egregious.
But in turn, anything that hits a providers pocketbook (whether or not it is legitimate, fair or otherwise) will always be a lightning rod for criticism. A few bad apples spoil the bunch - the fact that many providers bill in good faith does not exclude the fact that there are still those that bill for services that were not rendered, needed, or warranted. Any CPC worth their salt can stem a lot of headaches down the road by checking claims before they are submitted. But again - I am speaking from the recovery side. I work for a company that pursues overpayments for a third party insurance company, so my viewpoint will certainly be different than someone who works for a clinic or hospital





