FierceHealthcareFierceHealthITFierceHealthFinanceFierceEMRHospital ImpactFierceMobileHealthcare   FierceComplianceIT

HFMA ANI 2009: News and advice from the RAC front

It's not enough that Medicare's Recovery Audit Contractor program is going into full swing--CMS is also making some changes as it steams into its national rollout. Here's an update on some of the changes, as well as ongoing issues to bear in mind, from a talk given this week at the HFMA ANI show by Conifer Health Solutions' Rudy Braccili Jr., MBA, CPAM. (Braccili is senior director of the vendor's National Medicare & Medicaid Center.)

All told, from Braccili's account, the latest from the RAC program offers a mix of good and bad news, including the following:

* On the good news front, RAC contractors are now officially getting their 12 to 13 1/2 percent incentive to find underpayments to providers as well as overpayments. In the past, they were only going after overpayments, a mandate that raised cries that they had incentives to trump up issues and bury providers in paperwork.

* Another piece of good news that offers providers a breather: While the RACs will eventually review for both coding/billing errors and medical necessity, CMS has announced that the RACs won't begin to do medical necessity reviews until 2010.

* The four RACs are now being required to keep a list of areas they're watching, then publish it on their respective websites. They can only pursue a clinical area if they get permission from CMS, but once a single RAC gets that permission, you can assume that the others will follow suit, Braccili notes. For that reason, it's important to check all four sites regularly, he says.

One critical issue that Braccili covered in depth was the problem of when to appeal a decision. As other speakers at HFMA have noted, providers who prepare carefully can win their appeals in many cases.

On the other hand, it's not a good idea to appeal accusations of overpayment unless you're pretty sure you have a good case, Braccili suggests. The reason? If you take your appeal through two levels, and you lose, CMS will hold back the amount you owe, plus a stiff interest penalty. Besides, according to AHA estimates it can cost anywhere from $3,000 to $7,000 to appeal a claim, he notes.

SHARE WITH:
Email Twitter Facebook LinkedIn StumbleUpon
Get Your FREE FierceHealthFinance Email Newsletter:
Comments (3) | Post a comment

Comments

The RAC has gone a long ways towards keeping Medicare fraud more under control than it ever has been. Check the percentages - upon review, a lot of claims are billed in error, or upcoded, or simply do not have the documentation to support doing the service in the first place. Is the RAC 100% foolproof and the best thing in the world? Of course not - but it does a lot towards making providers and billing centers more cautious - and accountable - in regards to correct billing

Please dont make it sound like like RAC is Don Quixote in disguise, cleaning up the fraud in the Mrdicare system. It will never have the respect of providers because in the RAC contractors frequently are arbitrarily applying criteria and denying many bona fide acute hospitalizations. The approach has been to hit them hard and deny many claims in the knowledge that many hospitals dont have the staff to appeal through the various levels. Then they can tout the lack of reversals as testimony to their "appropriate denials". Hospitals need to either appeal or find denial management firms that can help sort through the bonafide denials and those that are egregious.

But in turn, anything that hits a providers pocketbook (whether or not it is legitimate, fair or otherwise) will always be a lightning rod for criticism. A few bad apples spoil the bunch - the fact that many providers bill in good faith does not exclude the fact that there are still those that bill for services that were not rendered, needed, or warranted. Any CPC worth their salt can stem a lot of headaches down the road by checking claims before they are submitted. But again - I am speaking from the recovery side. I work for a company that pursues overpayments for a third party insurance company, so my viewpoint will certainly be different than someone who works for a clinic or hospital

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

More information about formatting options

To combat spam, please enter the code in the image.