FierceHealthcareFierceHealthITFierceHealthFinanceFierceEMRHospital ImpactFierceMobileHealthcare   FierceCompliance IT

Hospitals not keeping up in healthcare profit race

Tools
Tags
Hospital Leaders
Healthcare Providers
Tenet Healthcare


As you'll see elsewhere, this has been a pretty good year for healthcare companies--but much better for biotechs, pharmas and medical device makers than for providers. 

A recent analysis by MarketWatch concludes that healthcare companies on the S&P 500 list did very well over the last 10 years, with biotechs, medical devicemakers and pharmas, in particular, seeing spectacular increases in profits and sales. Meanwhile, the only hospital group on the list, Tenet Healthcare, expects to see a drop in profits for the same period.

Stack Tenet up with other providers not on the list, and the picture is much brighter, with profits climbing four-fold, but that's way behind the group leaders. And within the larger group of hospital and healthcare providers analyzed by MarketWatch, hospitals actually saw profit growth that exceeded that of insurers.

That being said, my instinct is that with the products side of an industry posting stratospheric profits, while service providers lag, it's bad for the industry as a whole. I'd argue that the big difference in market power between these players has serious implications for the delivery of care.

Hospitals, and other providers in the delivery end of the system, do everything they can to build profits, of course. The recession, meanwhile, has pushed hospital CEOs to make cuts they'd probably considered imprudent or even impossible years ago. Still, hospital leaders can't shave costs forever. Some of the profits in the broader healthcare industry have to shift a bit if the system is to be sustainable. Besides, why should it be higher-value activity to build a machine or manufacture a drug than deliver a skilled service?

Unfortunately, there's no easy way to address this problem, save perhaps hospital companies were to somehow buy pharmas or medical devicemakers to reap their profits. But the reality is that unless other industries cross-subsidize actual hands-on care in some way, the system is wobbly at best. If nothing else, hospitals will ultimately stop being able to buy these high-margin products if manufacturers control too much of the capital. Arguably, that's been the case to some extent during this recession, and it could get worse.

Readers, do you think there's any realistic way to address this imbalance? Write to me and tell me what you think. - Anne

Bookmark and Share
Get Your FREE FierceHealthFinance Email Newsletter:
Comments (1) | Post a comment

Comments

Nice article.
I do think you must consider one other fact: that we must continue to reduce the cost of healthcare as the number of people entering the Medicare program begins to surge -- 78 million NEW beneficiaries over the next 20 years. Since we spend so much on end-of-life care, and we are all living longer, that means, if you do the math, that Medicare, not defense, education, welfare spending or waste, will drive our budget deficit. It is NOT a pretty picture.
The only way we can control this, is restructure healthcare, not tweak the "system" through improved access and insurance reform. If we do not make important changes, the consequences for the U.S. will be severe. But since Congress apparently lacks the expertise, vision or political courage (how could you blame them after the August Hysteria), you will only achieve meaningful restructuring by ongoing reductions in payments. Then the free market forces will kick into gear and we WILL restructure or fail.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

More information about formatting options

To combat spam, please enter the code in the image.