HOT TOPICS >> ARRA | Recovery Audit Contractors | Women in Health IT | Collections | Bond Ratings | Charity Care
Humana slammed after posting 65 percent increase in third quarter profits
Comments
come on . . .this is bad reporting. The made $301 Mil on revenue of $7.44 billion. That is a 4% profit not a 65% profit. The headline is totally misleading and bad reporting.
This article is a clear case of irresponsible reporting. Humana did not report a 65% profit. Profits increased 65% from the comparable quarter. The company did not report " third quarter earnings of $7.44 billion" It had revenues of $7.44 Billion. In any case the company earned 4.0% on revenue in the most recent quarter, which is at best a reasonable return.
Report the facts or make your political points elsewhere.
Do not misrepresent the article. The title says "65% INCREASE."
So, 4% profit is now evil? I daresay were you to hand your banker $10,000 to invest for you, and a year later he only hand you $10,400 you would accuse him of malfeasance.
This blog gets weaker by the day.
I don't understand the headline and language. It states that Humana 'earned' $7.44 billion in the quarter. What that means in plain English is that Humana had sales of $7.44 billion in the quarter. The article goes on to state that Humana's net income was $301.5 million. In English, that means Humana earned profits of $301.5 million in the quarter, a profit margin of slightly over 4%.
Irresponsible reporting is a chronic condition on a host of topics, not just healthcare. Did we close down all of the U.S. schools of journalism some time ago?
Sloppy used of the word 'earned' perhaps (though the number is clearly identified as REVENUE not earnings).
No more irresponsible than identifying your salary as 'what you earn' when in fact your 'earnings' (net) are much less (at least for me...)
I've said enough, the other one or two people commenting on this article are entitled to their opinions, though not to distortions.
Add me to the list of people totally disappointed by this poor reporting. Can we expect a prominent correction/retraction?





