Providers could face big squeeze in '09
![]()

Next year isn't likely to be pretty for providers. As a story in this week's newsletter notes, insurance companies have been watching profits fall, so they're likely to raise premiums in 2009. Then, the dominoes begin to fall: In an effort to save, employers will raise deductibles and co-pays, employees will carry bigger financial burdens and voilà--bad debt will rise. Worse, with health plans struggling to regain their profit levels, providers are likely to face tougher pressure to maintain, or even cut their rates. Then, of course, there's the crisis currently roiling the financial markets, which limits providers' ability to get loans, issue bonds and finance deals.
Add in the likelihood that health system reforms could be in play next year--when the U.S. swears in a new president--and you're looking at a scary 2009. If things don't play out just right, providers could face a serious squeeze, with patients who can't pay on one side and insurers who won't on the other.
Hospitals are particularly vulnerable here. With far too many operating on razor-thin margins (or losing money), next year could turn out to be a bloodbath, with the U.S. seeing an explosion of hospital bankruptcies and closures. Small wonder many are battening down and beginning to demand up-front cash payments for services where they can, though that, too has its down side. (This practice may slash bad debt, but it's not exactly warm and fuzzy, and besides, in a tough competitive market consumers may just go elsewhere.)
All that being said, providers aren't powerless. This is the year to begin partnering aggressively--one reason why physician-hospital JVs seem to be coming back into vogue--and to consider mergers and acquisitions that beef up your bargaining muscle quickly. After all, if I were a health plan negotiator, I'd try a "divide-and-conquer" strategy to get the best deals.
Now, it's your turn, readers. What strategies do you think providers (especially hospitals) need to pursue to survive the next year or two? Do you think their salvation lies in better managed care contracting? Building volume? Partnering? Attracting venture capital? Investing in new vehicles (say, medical real estate or biomedical start-ups)? I'd love to hear your thoughts. - Anne
Comments
Providers' fortunes (especially hospitals) are going to be determined more by their ability to get Washington to pay the real cost of their services than by how much more they can squeeze out of us (especially not for profits, like BCBSLA.)
On the hospital side, they make all their money on the private pay/private insurance customer while Medicaid and Medicare patients COST money to treat (negative profits of about 13 and 8% respectively on average). Physicians have it even worse. But the % of Medicare/Medicaid patients is GROWING, the % of privately insured is SHRINKING.
This means either the government pays full freight for the patients they are covering, or the docs/hospitals fail. We’ve got nowhere left to go.
I heard a hack the other day in the media exclaim: “Why doesn’t the government just put everybody on Medicare! That would solve all our problems.”
For about three days. Until all the hospitals closed and all the docs locked the door, turned out the lights, and went home.
Post new comment
Paid Research Reports
- Stakeholder Opinions: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - Adverse events with drug-eluting stents demand a new safety standard
- Impact of Pharmacogenomics on Public Healthcare Policy
- The Cardiovascular Disorders Market Outlook to 2012
- 2008 Trends to Watch: Pharmaceutical Technology
- Pharmaceutical Pricing and Reimbursement: Strategies for market access across the US, Europe, Japan and other key geographies


