HOT TOPICS >> ARRA | Recovery Audit Contractors | Women in Health IT | Collections | Bond Ratings | Charity Care
FAIR database might not be as fair as it sounds
Comments
Two quick comments: 1) the physicians and medical associations can require they contribute to funding and balance out what you see would be a bias towards the insurance companies since these companies were forced to fund the research. 2) Physicians influence will come from influencing/trying to influence rates by increasing billed charges to move the UCR scale up more, which would bias the database towards physicians, and driving up the cost of healthcare as well.
It would be nice to see articles, in the face of reform talks, that truly analyze what needs to occur so that all parties are paid fairly and the burden of costs aren't passed down to those least able to afford it - the average patient.
In response to a question about whether rates in the new database would be higher than in the old database, Dr. Freund responded: "I'm a scholar, and the data will tell me, but right now, I don't know."
If this is to be a data-driven process, that's the only appropriate response. We KNOW that the numbers in the Ingenix database were cooked and since Ingenix is owned by UnitedHealth, there was a tremendous conflict of interest to begin with.
As for physician involvement, the past president of the AMA is on the board. In any event, this is not intended to be a negotiation. It's a data driven process to determine "usual and customary" charges.





With UnitedHealthcare being forced to outsource its database physician out-of-network payment rates, doctors may have a better chance at getting paid what they bill. This is certainly a good thing for the medical community, which had every reason to be distressed by the extremely low balled numbers.