FierceHealthcareFierceHealthITFierceHealthFinanceHospital Impact   FierceSarbox
About | Sample | Privacy

TX hospitals reinvest medical liability savings

Tools
Tags
Quality Improvement Programs
non-economic damanges
Medical Specialists
Medical Malpractice
medical liability premiums
Liability Insurance Costs
Healthcare Finance

Five years after the state of Texas approved a constitutional amendment capping non-economic damages for medical malpractice at $250,000, the state's hospitals are reporting major cuts in liability costs. The hospitals have been investing the savings in new patient-related programs, according to a new survey released by the Texas Hospital Association (THA). The THA surveyed 10 healthcare systems and 10 independent hospitals, which represented 176 facilities, or about 55 percent of the private med-surg hospital population in the state.

The 109 hospitals providing premium information told the THA that they'd seen a collective decrease in annual medical malpractice premiums of more than $100 million between 2003 and the largest years reported, which were 2008 and 2009. In some cases, the drop happened despite the fact that hospital coverage limits doubled, and in some cases tripled.

THA researchers found that 85 percent of hospitals have found it easier to recruit medical specialists and subspecialists since the state's reforms were enacted. It also found that 69 percent of respondents had maintained or expanded one or more of their services because of falling hospital liability insurance costs. For example, one Victoria hospital was able to improve ED coverage and keep its Level III trauma center designation, and a Houston children's hospital was able to rollout a new high-risk obstetrics program and used millions of dollars in liability premium savings to expand patient safety and quality improvement programs.

Presumably, this study was released in part to counter opponents to the state's med mal damage caps, who have recently gone to the courts with an argument that imposing the caps is unconstitutional. These opponents note that prior to the 2003 caps, many carriers had increased rates by as much as 150 percent, a rise that hasn't even been covered yet by the drops described here.


To learn more about these survey results:
- read this Healthcare Finance News piece

Related Articles:
TX may change medical malpractice limits
CO considers raising medical malpractice caps
Judge overturns GA's medical malpractice damages limit
NC will limit some medical malpractice awards

Comments

The article is horribly misleading. It makes it look like there is a profit being made. All these 100m figures are is made up numbers by the hospital association. They are inferring without proof that premiums (although not at all decreased from before the changes and still climbing might have increased even faster without reforms). To represent that somehow money exists that didn't exist before is false and misleading.

Allen Kahn

This is interesting. I saw a comparative on www.lawsuitabusewatch.net between Tort Reform Texas and Personal Injury Pennsylvania:

http://lawsuitabusewatch.net/2008/02/15/a-tale-of-two-states/

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

More information about formatting options

What is 85 + 12?
To combat spam, please solve the math question above.